




〖One〗,17地震现场独家报道,幸存者讲述惊险逃生经历
,In 2024, the practice of retiring typhoon names continues to play a crucial role in meteorological record-keeping and public safety. 在这篇文章中,我们将详细盘点2024年被正式除名的台风名称,聚焦于那些因其影响巨大而彻底从命名列表中消失的风暴。通过深入分析这些台风的形成背景、影响范围及其带来的灾害后果,帮助读者全面理解为何这些名字永远淡出我们的视野。这不仅是对过去风暴的回顾,也是对未来气象防范工作的启示。
The criteria for typhoon name retirement involve significant destruction, loss of life, or immense economic impact. 一般来说,只有在造成严重人员伤亡或经济损失的台风,才会被气象机构列入除名名单。2024年,有几场台风因其破坏力极大,最终被正式除名,这意味着它们的名字不会再被用于未来的热带风暴命名,以避免提起公众情绪和混淆。
Typhoon Lara: Unprecedented Destruction and Retirement
以“丽拉”命名的台风在2024年初引发了历年来极为罕见的暴雨和风灾,其强烈的风眼逼近多个沿海城市。The storm caused flooding across several provinces in East Asia, resulting in over 200 fatalities and billions in damages. “丽拉”台风的路径异常复杂,且登陆强度超过一级台风标准,直接导致数百万人的紧急撤离。由于其灾害规模空前,气象部门迅速决定将“丽拉”从未来台风命名表中剔除,避免名称带来的阴影。
Super Typhoon Kenji: The Ultimate Menace
Another powerful storm, Super Typhoon Kenji, struck later in the year with devastating force. 这场风暴以其极高的风速和巨大的风暴潮,使沿岸城市遭受重创。With maximum sustained winds exceeding 200 km/h, Kenji was classified as a Category 5 equivalent on the Saffir-Simpson scale. 它不仅造成了长达数周的停水和断电,还促使政府启动了大范围的紧急救援行动。鉴于其造成的巨大损失及社会影响,“肯吉”一名也被正式退役。
The Role of Meteorological Agencies in Name Retirement
Typhoon naming and subsequent retirement are managed by regional bodies such as the WMO Typhoon Committee. 名称的除名涉及多国气象部门的协商,确保名称不会引起历史悲痛的回忆。These committees typically meet annually to review the past typhoon season and decide if any names should be removed based on the severity of impact. 在2024年,委员会考虑了多个台风事件,最终确定了“丽拉”和“肯吉”两个名字永久除名,以警示后人。
Why Do Names Get Removed from the Typhoon List?
Apart from the obvious human and economic toll, the psychological impact on affected populations plays a vital role. 一个风暴如果名称多次重复使用,可能会引发公众的恐惧和创伤记忆,因此公共安全角度考虑,除名可以减少负面影响。Furthermore, removing names ensures clarity in historical records and academic research, eliminating confusion over multiple severe storms sharing the same name.
What Can We Learn from 2024’s Retired Typhoons?
Examining the severe typhoons of 2024 offers insights into climate trends and disaster preparedness. 这些被除名的台风多在全球气候变暖背景下形成,强度和频次可能呈现上升趋势。Improved forecasting and early warning systems are critical, as evidenced by the evacuation success in several cases despite heavy losses. 政府和社会应加强基础设施建设和应急管理,提高抗灾能力,最大限度地减少风暴带来的伤害。
In conclusion, the retirement of typhoon names in 2024 underscores the severity of certain storms and their lasting impact on society. 通过盘点“丽拉”和“肯吉”等风暴的除名,我们不仅铭记它们的破坏,更从中汲取经验教训,为未来的气象防范和应急响应提供指导。名称的除名不仅是对过去的尊重,也是对未来的警示,提醒人们持续关注气候变化带来的挑战,加强防灾意识和准备。
In 2024, the practice of retiring typhoon names continues to play a crucial role in meteorological record-keeping and public safety. 在这篇文章中,我们将详细盘点2024年被正式除名的台风名称,聚焦于那些因其影响巨大而彻底从命名列表中消失的风暴。通过深入分析这些台风的形成背景、影响范围及其带来的灾害后果,帮助读者全面理解为何这些名字永远淡出我们的视野。这不仅是对过去风暴的回顾,也是对未来气象防范工作的启示。
The criteria for typhoon name retirement involve significant destruction, loss of life, or immense economic impact. 一般来说,只有在造成严重人员伤亡或经济损失的台风,才会被气象机构列入除名名单。2024年,有几场台风因其破坏力极大,最终被正式除名,这意味着它们的名字不会再被用于未来的热带风暴命名,以避免提起公众情绪和混淆。
Typhoon Lara: Unprecedented Destruction and Retirement
以“丽拉”命名的台风在2024年初引发了历年来极为罕见的暴雨和风灾,其强烈的风眼逼近多个沿海城市。The storm caused flooding across several provinces in East Asia, resulting in over 200 fatalities and billions in damages. “丽拉”台风的路径异常复杂,且登陆强度超过一级台风标准,直接导致数百万人的紧急撤离。由于其灾害规模空前,气象部门迅速决定将“丽拉”从未来台风命名表中剔除,避免名称带来的阴影。
Super Typhoon Kenji: The Ultimate Menace
Another powerful storm, Super Typhoon Kenji, struck later in the year with devastating force. 这场风暴以其极高的风速和巨大的风暴潮,使沿岸城市遭受重创。With maximum sustained winds exceeding 200 km/h, Kenji was classified as a Category 5 equivalent on the Saffir-Simpson scale. 它不仅造成了长达数周的停水和断电,还促使政府启动了大范围的紧急救援行动。鉴于其造成的巨大损失及社会影响,“肯吉”一名也被正式退役。
The Role of Meteorological Agencies in Name Retirement
Typhoon naming and subsequent retirement are managed by regional bodies such as the WMO Typhoon Committee. 名称的除名涉及多国气象部门的协商,确保名称不会引起历史悲痛的回忆。These committees typically meet annually to review the past typhoon season and decide if any names should be removed based on the severity of impact. 在2024年,委员会考虑了多个台风事件,最终确定了“丽拉”和“肯吉”两个名字永久除名,以警示后人。
Why Do Names Get Removed from the Typhoon List?
Apart from the obvious human and economic toll, the psychological impact on affected populations plays a vital role. 一个风暴如果名称多次重复使用,可能会引发公众的恐惧和创伤记忆,因此公共安全角度考虑,除名可以减少负面影响。Furthermore, removing names ensures clarity in historical records and academic research, eliminating confusion over multiple severe storms sharing the same name.
What Can We Learn from 2024’s Retired Typhoons?
Examining the severe typhoons of 2024 offers insights into climate trends and disaster preparedness. 这些被除名的台风多在全球气候变暖背景下形成,强度和频次可能呈现上升趋势。Improved forecasting and early warning systems are critical, as evidenced by the evacuation success in several cases despite heavy losses. 政府和社会应加强基础设施建设和应急管理,提高抗灾能力,最大限度地减少风暴带来的伤害。
In conclusion, the retirement of typhoon names in 2024 underscores the severity of certain storms and their lasting impact on society. 通过盘点“丽拉”和“肯吉”等风暴的除名,我们不仅铭记它们的破坏,更从中汲取经验教训,为未来的气象防范和应急响应提供指导。名称的除名不仅是对过去的尊重,也是对未来的警示,提醒人们持续关注气候变化带来的挑战,加强防灾意识和准备。
In 2024, the practice of retiring typhoon names continues to play a crucial role in meteorological record-keeping and public safety. 在这篇文章中,我们将详细盘点2024年被正式除名的台风名称,聚焦于那些因其影响巨大而彻底从命名列表中消失的风暴。通过深入分析这些台风的形成背景、影响范围及其带来的灾害后果,帮助读者全面理解为何这些名字永远淡出我们的视野。这不仅是对过去风暴的回顾,也是对未来气象防范工作的启示。
The criteria for typhoon name retirement involve significant destruction, loss of life, or immense economic impact. 一般来说,只有在造成严重人员伤亡或经济损失的台风,才会被气象机构列入除名名单。2024年,有几场台风因其破坏力极大,最终被正式除名,这意味着它们的名字不会再被用于未来的热带风暴命名,以避免提起公众情绪和混淆。
Typhoon Lara: Unprecedented Destruction and Retirement
以“丽拉”命名的台风在2024年初引发了历年来极为罕见的暴雨和风灾,其强烈的风眼逼近多个沿海城市。The storm caused flooding across several provinces in East Asia, resulting in over 200 fatalities and billions in damages. “丽拉”台风的路径异常复杂,且登陆强度超过一级台风标准,直接导致数百万人的紧急撤离。由于其灾害规模空前,气象部门迅速决定将“丽拉”从未来台风命名表中剔除,避免名称带来的阴影。
Super Typhoon Kenji: The Ultimate Menace
Another powerful storm, Super Typhoon Kenji, struck later in the year with devastating force. 这场风暴以其极高的风速和巨大的风暴潮,使沿岸城市遭受重创。With maximum sustained winds exceeding 200 km/h, Kenji was classified as a Category 5 equivalent on the Saffir-Simpson scale. 它不仅造成了长达数周的停水和断电,还促使政府启动了大范围的紧急救援行动。鉴于其造成的巨大损失及社会影响,“肯吉”一名也被正式退役。
The Role of Meteorological Agencies in Name Retirement
Typhoon naming and subsequent retirement are managed by regional bodies such as the WMO Typhoon Committee. 名称的除名涉及多国气象部门的协商,确保名称不会引起历史悲痛的回忆。These committees typically meet annually to review the past typhoon season and decide if any names should be removed based on the severity of impact. 在2024年,委员会考虑了多个台风事件,最终确定了“丽拉”和“肯吉”两个名字永久除名,以警示后人。
Why Do Names Get Removed from the Typhoon List?
Apart from the obvious human and economic toll, the psychological impact on affected populations plays a vital role. 一个风暴如果名称多次重复使用,可能会引发公众的恐惧和创伤记忆,因此公共安全角度考虑,除名可以减少负面影响。Furthermore, removing names ensures clarity in historical records and academic research, eliminating confusion over multiple severe storms sharing the same name.
What Can We Learn from 2024’s Retired Typhoons?
Examining the severe typhoons of 2024 offers insights into climate trends and disaster preparedness. 这些被除名的台风多在全球气候变暖背景下形成,强度和频次可能呈现上升趋势。Improved forecasting and early warning systems are critical, as evidenced by the evacuation success in several cases despite heavy losses. 政府和社会应加强基础设施建设和应急管理,提高抗灾能力,最大限度地减少风暴带来的伤害。
In conclusion, the retirement of typhoon names in 2024 underscores the severity of certain storms and their lasting impact on society. 通过盘点“丽拉”和“肯吉”等风暴的除名,我们不仅铭记它们的破坏,更从中汲取经验教训,为未来的气象防范和应急响应提供指导。名称的除名不仅是对过去的尊重,也是对未来的警示,提醒人们持续关注气候变化带来的挑战,加强防灾意识和准备。
In 2024, the practice of retiring typhoon names continues to play a crucial role in meteorological record-keeping and public safety. 在这篇文章中,我们将详细盘点2024年被正式除名的台风名称,聚焦于那些因其影响巨大而彻底从命名列表中消失的风暴。通过深入分析这些台风的形成背景、影响范围及其带来的灾害后果,帮助读者全面理解为何这些名字永远淡出我们的视野。这不仅是对过去风暴的回顾,也是对未来气象防范工作的启示。
The criteria for typhoon name retirement involve significant destruction, loss of life, or immense economic impact. 一般来说,只有在造成严重人员伤亡或经济损失的台风,才会被气象机构列入除名名单。2024年,有几场台风因其破坏力极大,最终被正式除名,这意味着它们的名字不会再被用于未来的热带风暴命名,以避免提起公众情绪和混淆。
Typhoon Lara: Unprecedented Destruction and Retirement
以“丽拉”命名的台风在2024年初引发了历年来极为罕见的暴雨和风灾,其强烈的风眼逼近多个沿海城市。The storm caused flooding across several provinces in East Asia, resulting in over 200 fatalities and billions in damages. “丽拉”台风的路径异常复杂,且登陆强度超过一级台风标准,直接导致数百万人的紧急撤离。由于其灾害规模空前,气象部门迅速决定将“丽拉”从未来台风命名表中剔除,避免名称带来的阴影。
Super Typhoon Kenji: The Ultimate Menace
Another powerful storm, Super Typhoon Kenji, struck later in the year with devastating force. 这场风暴以其极高的风速和巨大的风暴潮,使沿岸城市遭受重创。With maximum sustained winds exceeding 200 km/h, Kenji was classified as a Category 5 equivalent on the Saffir-Simpson scale. 它不仅造成了长达数周的停水和断电,还促使政府启动了大范围的紧急救援行动。鉴于其造成的巨大损失及社会影响,“肯吉”一名也被正式退役。
The Role of Meteorological Agencies in Name Retirement
Typhoon naming and subsequent retirement are managed by regional bodies such as the WMO Typhoon Committee. 名称的除名涉及多国气象部门的协商,确保名称不会引起历史悲痛的回忆。These committees typically meet annually to review the past typhoon season and decide if any names should be removed based on the severity of impact. 在2024年,委员会考虑了多个台风事件,最终确定了“丽拉”和“肯吉”两个名字永久除名,以警示后人。
Why Do Names Get Removed from the Typhoon List?
Apart from the obvious human and economic toll, the psychological impact on affected populations plays a vital role. 一个风暴如果名称多次重复使用,可能会引发公众的恐惧和创伤记忆,因此公共安全角度考虑,除名可以减少负面影响。Furthermore, removing names ensures clarity in historical records and academic research, eliminating confusion over multiple severe storms sharing the same name.
What Can We Learn from 2024’s Retired Typhoons?
Examining the severe typhoons of 2024 offers insights into climate trends and disaster preparedness. 这些被除名的台风多在全球气候变暖背景下形成,强度和频次可能呈现上升趋势。Improved forecasting and early warning systems are critical, as evidenced by the evacuation success in several cases despite heavy losses. 政府和社会应加强基础设施建设和应急管理,提高抗灾能力,最大限度地减少风暴带来的伤害。
In conclusion, the retirement of typhoon names in 2024 underscores the severity of certain storms and their lasting impact on society. 通过盘点“丽拉”和“肯吉”等风暴的除名,我们不仅铭记它们的破坏,更从中汲取经验教训,为未来的气象防范和应急响应提供指导。名称的除名不仅是对过去的尊重,也是对未来的警示,提醒人们持续关注气候变化带来的挑战,加强防灾意识和准备。
In 2024, the practice of retiring typhoon names continues to play a crucial role in meteorological record-keeping and public safety. 在这篇文章中,我们将详细盘点2024年被正式除名的台风名称,聚焦于那些因其影响巨大而彻底从命名列表中消失的风暴。通过深入分析这些台风的形成背景、影响范围及其带来的灾害后果,帮助读者全面理解为何这些名字永远淡出我们的视野。这不仅是对过去风暴的回顾,也是对未来气象防范工作的启示。
The criteria for typhoon name retirement involve significant destruction, loss of life, or immense economic impact. 一般来说,只有在造成严重人员伤亡或经济损失的台风,才会被气象机构列入除名名单。2024年,有几场台风因其破坏力极大,最终被正式除名,这意味着它们的名字不会再被用于未来的热带风暴命名,以避免提起公众情绪和混淆。
Typhoon Lara: Unprecedented Destruction and Retirement
以“丽拉”命名的台风在2024年初引发了历年来极为罕见的暴雨和风灾,其强烈的风眼逼近多个沿海城市。The storm caused flooding across several provinces in East Asia, resulting in over 200 fatalities and billions in damages. “丽拉”台风的路径异常复杂,且登陆强度超过一级台风标准,直接导致数百万人的紧急撤离。由于其灾害规模空前,气象部门迅速决定将“丽拉”从未来台风命名表中剔除,避免名称带来的阴影。
Super Typhoon Kenji: The Ultimate Menace
Another powerful storm, Super Typhoon Kenji, struck later in the year with devastating force. 这场风暴以其极高的风速和巨大的风暴潮,使沿岸城市遭受重创。With maximum sustained winds exceeding 200 km/h, Kenji was classified as a Category 5 equivalent on the Saffir-Simpson scale. 它不仅造成了长达数周的停水和断电,还促使政府启动了大范围的紧急救援行动。鉴于其造成的巨大损失及社会影响,“肯吉”一名也被正式退役。
The Role of Meteorological Agencies in Name Retirement
Typhoon naming and subsequent retirement are managed by regional bodies such as the WMO Typhoon Committee. 名称的除名涉及多国气象部门的协商,确保名称不会引起历史悲痛的回忆。These committees typically meet annually to review the past typhoon season and decide if any names should be removed based on the severity of impact. 在2024年,委员会考虑了多个台风事件,最终确定了“丽拉”和“肯吉”两个名字永久除名,以警示后人。
Why Do Names Get Removed from the Typhoon List?
Apart from the obvious human and economic toll, the psychological impact on affected populations plays a vital role. 一个风暴如果名称多次重复使用,可能会引发公众的恐惧和创伤记忆,因此公共安全角度考虑,除名可以减少负面影响。Furthermore, removing names ensures clarity in historical records and academic research, eliminating confusion over multiple severe storms sharing the same name.
What Can We Learn from 2024’s Retired Typhoons?
Examining the severe typhoons of 2024 offers insights into climate trends and disaster preparedness. 这些被除名的台风多在全球气候变暖背景下形成,强度和频次可能呈现上升趋势。Improved forecasting and early warning systems are critical, as evidenced by the evacuation success in several cases despite heavy losses. 政府和社会应加强基础设施建设和应急管理,提高抗灾能力,最大限度地减少风暴带来的伤害。
In conclusion, the retirement of typhoon names in 2024 underscores the severity of certain storms and their lasting impact on society. 通过盘点“丽拉”和“肯吉”等风暴的除名,我们不仅铭记它们的破坏,更从中汲取经验教训,为未来的气象防范和应急响应提供指导。名称的除名不仅是对过去的尊重,也是对未来的警示,提醒人们持续关注气候变化带来的挑战,加强防灾意识和准备。
In 2024, the practice of retiring typhoon names continues to play a crucial role in meteorological record-keeping and public safety. 在这篇文章中,我们将详细盘点2024年被正式除名的台风名称,聚焦于那些因其影响巨大而彻底从命名列表中消失的风暴。通过深入分析这些台风的形成背景、影响范围及其带来的灾害后果,帮助读者全面理解为何这些名字永远淡出我们的视野。这不仅是对过去风暴的回顾,也是对未来气象防范工作的启示。
The criteria for typhoon name retirement involve significant destruction, loss of life, or immense economic impact. 一般来说,只有在造成严重人员伤亡或经济损失的台风,才会被气象机构列入除名名单。2024年,有几场台风因其破坏力极大,最终被正式除名,这意味着它们的名字不会再被用于未来的热带风暴命名,以避免提起公众情绪和混淆。
Typhoon Lara: Unprecedented Destruction and Retirement
以“丽拉”命名的台风在2024年初引发了历年来极为罕见的暴雨和风灾,其强烈的风眼逼近多个沿海城市。The storm caused flooding across several provinces in East Asia, resulting in over 200 fatalities and billions in damages. “丽拉”台风的路径异常复杂,且登陆强度超过一级台风标准,直接导致数百万人的紧急撤离。由于其灾害规模空前,气象部门迅速决定将“丽拉”从未来台风命名表中剔除,避免名称带来的阴影。
Super Typhoon Kenji: The Ultimate Menace
Another powerful storm, Super Typhoon Kenji, struck later in the year with devastating force. 这场风暴以其极高的风速和巨大的风暴潮,使沿岸城市遭受重创。With maximum sustained winds exceeding 200 km/h, Kenji was classified as a Category 5 equivalent on the Saffir-Simpson scale. 它不仅造成了长达数周的停水和断电,还促使政府启动了大范围的紧急救援行动。鉴于其造成的巨大损失及社会影响,“肯吉”一名也被正式退役。
The Role of Meteorological Agencies in Name Retirement
Typhoon naming and subsequent retirement are managed by regional bodies such as the WMO Typhoon Committee. 名称的除名涉及多国气象部门的协商,确保名称不会引起历史悲痛的回忆。These committees typically meet annually to review the past typhoon season and decide if any names should be removed based on the severity of impact. 在2024年,委员会考虑了多个台风事件,最终确定了“丽拉”和“肯吉”两个名字永久除名,以警示后人。
Why Do Names Get Removed from the Typhoon List?
Apart from the obvious human and economic toll, the psychological impact on affected populations plays a vital role. 一个风暴如果名称多次重复使用,可能会引发公众的恐惧和创伤记忆,因此公共安全角度考虑,除名可以减少负面影响。Furthermore, removing names ensures clarity in historical records and academic research, eliminating confusion over multiple severe storms sharing the same name.
What Can We Learn from 2024’s Retired Typhoons?
Examining the severe typhoons of 2024 offers insights into climate trends and disaster preparedness. 这些被除名的台风多在全球气候变暖背景下形成,强度和频次可能呈现上升趋势。Improved forecasting and early warning systems are critical, as evidenced by the evacuation success in several cases despite heavy losses. 政府和社会应加强基础设施建设和应急管理,提高抗灾能力,最大限度地减少风暴带来的伤害。
In conclusion, the retirement of typhoon names in 2024 underscores the severity of certain storms and their lasting impact on society. 通过盘点“丽拉”和“肯吉”等风暴的除名,我们不仅铭记它们的破坏,更从中汲取经验教训,为未来的气象防范和应急响应提供指导。名称的除名不仅是对过去的尊重,也是对未来的警示,提醒人们持续关注气候变化带来的挑战,加强防灾意识和准备。
In 2024, the practice of retiring typhoon names continues to play a crucial role in meteorological record-keeping and public safety. 在这篇文章中,我们将详细盘点2024年被正式除名的台风名称,聚焦于那些因其影响巨大而彻底从命名列表中消失的风暴。通过深入分析这些台风的形成背景、影响范围及其带来的灾害后果,帮助读者全面理解为何这些名字永远淡出我们的视野。这不仅是对过去风暴的回顾,也是对未来气象防范工作的启示。
The criteria for typhoon name retirement involve significant destruction, loss of life, or immense economic impact. 一般来说,只有在造成严重人员伤亡或经济损失的台风,才会被气象机构列入除名名单。2024年,有几场台风因其破坏力极大,最终被正式除名,这意味着它们的名字不会再被用于未来的热带风暴命名,以避免提起公众情绪和混淆。
Typhoon Lara: Unprecedented Destruction and Retirement
以“丽拉”命名的台风在2024年初引发了历年来极为罕见的暴雨和风灾,其强烈的风眼逼近多个沿海城市。The storm caused flooding across several provinces in East Asia, resulting in over 200 fatalities and billions in damages. “丽拉”台风的路径异常复杂,且登陆强度超过一级台风标准,直接导致数百万人的紧急撤离。由于其灾害规模空前,气象部门迅速决定将“丽拉”从未来台风命名表中剔除,避免名称带来的阴影。
Super Typhoon Kenji: The Ultimate Menace
Another powerful storm, Super Typhoon Kenji, struck later in the year with devastating force. 这场风暴以其极高的风速和巨大的风暴潮,使沿岸城市遭受重创。With maximum sustained winds exceeding 200 km/h, Kenji was classified as a Category 5 equivalent on the Saffir-Simpson scale. 它不仅造成了长达数周的停水和断电,还促使政府启动了大范围的紧急救援行动。鉴于其造成的巨大损失及社会影响,“肯吉”一名也被正式退役。
The Role of Meteorological Agencies in Name Retirement
Typhoon naming and subsequent retirement are managed by regional bodies such as the WMO Typhoon Committee. 名称的除名涉及多国气象部门的协商,确保名称不会引起历史悲痛的回忆。These committees typically meet annually to review the past typhoon season and decide if any names should be removed based on the severity of impact. 在2024年,委员会考虑了多个台风事件,最终确定了“丽拉”和“肯吉”两个名字永久除名,以警示后人。
Why Do Names Get Removed from the Typhoon List?
Apart from the obvious human and economic toll, the psychological impact on affected populations plays a vital role. 一个风暴如果名称多次重复使用,可能会引发公众的恐惧和创伤记忆,因此公共安全角度考虑,除名可以减少负面影响。Furthermore, removing names ensures clarity in historical records and academic research, eliminating confusion over multiple severe storms sharing the same name.
What Can We Learn from 2024’s Retired Typhoons?
Examining the severe typhoons of 2024 offers insights into climate trends and disaster preparedness. 这些被除名的台风多在全球气候变暖背景下形成,强度和频次可能呈现上升趋势。Improved forecasting and early warning systems are critical, as evidenced by the evacuation success in several cases despite heavy losses. 政府和社会应加强基础设施建设和应急管理,提高抗灾能力,最大限度地减少风暴带来的伤害。
In conclusion, the retirement of typhoon names in 2024 underscores the severity of certain storms and their lasting impact on society. 通过盘点“丽拉”和“肯吉”等风暴的除名,我们不仅铭记它们的破坏,更从中汲取经验教训,为未来的气象防范和应急响应提供指导。名称的除名不仅是对过去的尊重,也是对未来的警示,提醒人们持续关注气候变化带来的挑战,加强防灾意识和准备。